Environment · GS3
ABS funds distributed through biodiversity institutions
One line
The National Biodiversity Authority distributed ₹2.82 crore in benefit-sharing funds to biodiversity institutions and ICAR-IIHR.
Summary
The case shows how benefits may be routed when resources cannot be traced to one individual source. Transparent use and conservation outcomes still need reporting.
PYQ pattern
UPSC often tests the institution, mechanism, and limits behind this development. Use the official UPSC question-paper archive.
Core notes
- The National Biodiversity Authority is a statutory body.
- The release is a current trigger; implementation or operational results require separate evidence.
- Institutions need clear data, accountability, and review arrangements.
Prelims lens
- The National Biodiversity Authority is a statutory body.
- Distinguish announcement, approval, delivery, and measured outcome.
- Check the responsible institution and legal basis.
MCQ 1
Consider the following statements:
- The National Biodiversity Authority is a statutory body.
- ABS money is the same as a pollution fine.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A. 1 only
- B. 2 only
- C. Both 1 and 2
- D. Neither 1 nor 2
Reveal answerHide answer
A
Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is an overstatement or incorrect relationship.
MCQ 2
The Nagoya Protocol concerns:
- A. Access and benefit sharing
- B. Ozone depletion
- C. Nuclear safety
- D. Maritime boundaries
Reveal answerHide answer
A
Access and benefit sharing is correct.
Mains
Question, 10 marks, 150 words: How should biodiversity authorities distribute benefits when individual providers cannot be identified?
Approach:
- Define the institution, indicator, or technology.
- Explain its significance.
- Examine limits and implementation gaps.
- Suggest specific accountability measures.